LOCAL OBSERVATION
Agents operate on partial state. No ant receives the complete colony map.
oᵢ(t)=sense(Eₜ, radiusᵢ)The brain view is a derived graph of recurring signal paths, ant transitions and reinforced environmental traces. Strong edges are repeated coordination, not direct agent-to-agent messaging.
Agents operate on partial state. No ant receives the complete colony map.
oᵢ(t)=sense(Eₜ, radiusᵢ)Recent encounters bias future motion without giving an ant global historical context.
mᵢ(t+1)=compress(mᵢ,oᵢ,aᵢ)The environment carries delayed messages. Trails can reinforce, collide or disappear.
Pₜ₊₁=λPₜ+Σ depositᵢCoherence is measured at the colony level from flows, route reuse and response to perturbation.
C=f(flow, reuse, recovery)ANT AGENT is a colony of intentionally limited autonomous agents. Each ant sees only a local world, carries a tiny memory and leaves signals behind. No ant owns the global plan. The larger behavior appears from coordination.
Each ant samples only a local radius: nearby food, nest vector, hazards, pheromone gradients and a small number of neighbors.
A compact state machine combines local signals with memory and noise. The policy is deliberately weaker than the colony.
Movement changes the environment. Returning ants strengthen food trails. Exploring ants maintain a weak home gradient.
Useful routes become statistically easier to discover. Bad trails decay. Colony-level attention moves without a central dispatcher.
ANT AGENT avoids a fully connected chat network. Agents write compact traces into a shared field. Other agents may encounter those traces later, validate them through their own observations and reinforce or ignore them.
A pheromone trace is not treated as truth. Every signal loses weight over time unless new independent activity reinforces the same region.
Microscopic movement remains computational state. At selected ticks the system can commit state roots, policy hashes and experiment metadata onchain, making later rewriting detectable without pretending every ant step belongs in consensus.
agents / field / memory0x84f1...09ac0x19ba...e21dseed / tick / paramsCHECKPOINT ✓7F-31-A8-0C-91-E2-B4-18The central design constraint is asymmetric capability: an individual agent should remain small enough that any useful macro-behavior can reasonably be attributed to interaction rather than a hidden omniscient model.
observation = sense(radius=24) trace = gradient(field) memory = last_k(8) action = π(observation, trace, memory, noise) world = apply(action) field = deposit(world, state) // no access to colony global state
Can weak local gradients produce stable efficient routes without route planning?
How rapidly does the colony reorganize after a food source disappears or a danger zone is introduced?
Can environmental traces function as durable collective memory even when individual memory remains tiny?
Can the same substrate allocate scarce resources under explicit permissions without granting any ant global authority?
An individual ant has a limited view of the world. ANT AGENT asks whether many limited agents, interacting over time, can produce useful collective behavior without a central planner.
The simulation does not pretend every microscopic action needs consensus. Computation produces behavior; cryptographic commitments preserve the moments that matter.
Persistent agent identity and financial authority are separate layers. Future economic experiments can remain bounded by explicit permissions, caps and observable rules.
Individual ants can be wrong. Signals can decay. Routes can disappear. The interesting question is whether the system becomes resilient because its components are imperfect.
Later experiments can introduce energy, computation, memory and capital as scarce resources. Trading is not the identity of ANT AGENT; it is one possible environment in which collective allocation can be measured.